Organizational Innovation and Change - Critical Thinking Mod 8 - The Essay - 1

Hierarchical Innovation and Change - Critical Thinking Mod 8 - The Challenger and Columbia Shuttle Disasters - Essay Example Both the Challenger and Columbia transport fiascos were a consequence of feeble authoritative societies alongside other basic variables. After the Challenger catastrophe of 1986, the Rogers Commission thought of various proposals for NASA which incorporated a rebuilding of the administration structure just as an adjustment in the hierarchical culture so as to do a progressively brought together dynamic for powerful security measures. Because of these measures and suggestions, NASA changed its authoritative culture by concentrating more on the execution of security measures and by appointing more experts for these wellbeing and quality confirmation measures. Notwithstanding, the result of the Columbia catastrophe uncovered that NASA couldn't support these powerful changes as it had really executed scaling back strategies in light of an absence of financing. Rather, of utilizing particular and prepared work from inside the organization for these sensitive and basic wellbeing measures, NASA rather turned to redistributing these obligations. Besides, the accentuation on the security measures was decreased as the arrangeme nts were coordinated towards cost decrease as opposed to on improvement and wellbeing measures. The arrangements embraced depended on the past accomplishment of NASA and the issues related with wellbeing, as opposed to looked into upon, were overlooked. Rather than planning gatherings for additional enhancements and advancements, the administration concentrated on momentary tasks. So as to increase upper hand and continue powerful changes in the association, it is critical to put resources into long haul openings and do long haul arranging. It was likewise seen that NASA missed various signs and if these would have recognized, the catastrophes of Challenger and Columbia could have been stayed away from (Oberg, J. 2013). NASA likewise confronted issues as far as its pecking order and authoritative control.